U.S. Senator again criticizes league's handling of the investigation ...Read the full article
This conversation is closed
- Skip to the latest comment
-
David P from Canada writes: Yeah, like the No Fun League will let anyone from the outside peer into their closet...not with all the billions they have at stake running as the status quo...
- Posted 14/05/08 at 1:34 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
D G from Canada writes: Good. Let's find out the truth before Goodell destroys any more evidence.
I don't know why the NFL let a Patriot's lawyer listen to Walsh's discussion with Goodell. This wasn't a court of law or a disposition taking.- Posted 14/05/08 at 2:44 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Sean O'Reilly from Canada writes: Another productive day for the senate in the US.
- Posted 14/05/08 at 3:05 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
CD W from Canada writes: He needs to tell the real truth about the Kennedy murder. He was the lawyer, tell the truth, or maybe you really believe the single bullet.
- Posted 14/05/08 at 8:14 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
dan vanman from Canada writes: What a joke. Instead of focusing on such global issues as Iraq, and Specter is a senior man with lots of pull in Washington, this guy is focusing on the NFL. Its all because he is an Eagles fan. He admitted as much on CNN. This shows how screwed up the world is when this guy wastes time on the NFL, while people are dying. Talk about misplaced priorities.
- Posted 14/05/08 at 9:46 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Joe Dirt from Canada writes: I wonder how much money Sen Specter had bet on Super Bowl XXXIX? How else do you explain this?
- Posted 14/05/08 at 10:05 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Comments are closed
Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.
Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.


