European soccer's governing body is keen to end confusion ...Read the full article
This conversation is closed
- Skip to the latest comment
-
Alias No Name from Vanuatu writes: Who cares...The FIFA Laws of the game that when the "whole" of the ball crossed the goal line,it should count as a goal!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Posted 29/03/08 at 12:53 AM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Blue Nose from Canada writes: How is your comment anywhere related to the story?
The story, if you read it, actually wants to clarify whether a shot fired by a player that ricchocets off another should count as the shooters goal or an own-goal by the defender. Own goals should be those where the ball is from a deliberate play of the ball. Sticking one's ankle out and the ball taking a bad bounce shouldn't go down as an own goal- Posted 30/03/08 at 3:05 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
_rangeviper _ from Canada writes: I agree with you for the most part Blue Nose.
A deliberate play on the ball, which ranges from an errant backpass to sticking a leg out purposely to try to block a shot should be considered an own goal. Otherwise, chalk it up to bad luck for a defender who takes a ricoochet off the back or something along those lines. Although the arguement could be made for any shot originally aiming to miss the net and deflected by any means back into the net might be an own goal.- Posted 31/03/08 at 3:34 PM EST | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Comments are closed
Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.
Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.


