Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Truth & rumours

Cherry condemns Roys for QMJHL incident

WILLIAM HOUSTON

From Friday's Globe and Mail

Latest comment posted at 2:15 PM EST 28/03/08

Fighting proponent would still hire Hall of Fame goalie as a coach if he were in the market ...Read the full article

This conversation is closed

  1. Robert Miller from Halifax, Canada writes: What??? I agree with Don Cherry on something ???

    This is surely one of the seven signs of the apocalypse... It's just not possible !!
  2. j wilson from vancouver, Canada writes: You mean that you were wrong?
  3. Robert Miller from Halifax, Canada writes: j wilson from vancouver, Canada:

    Don Cherry is never wrong, is he?

    Well, except on that birthplace of hockey issue and the idea that Sid Crosby is a 'hot dog,' but other than that?

    This kind of premedicated and unprovoked attack on a hockey rink in junior is an assault by definition. These incidents are simply bad for the game and do nothing to market our national sport to any larger audience. Why not enjoy the game for the actual hockey skills of the players?

    Coaches who encourage such behaviours should have no place coaching nor owning a QJMHL franchise....

    This should be strike number 2 for Mr. Roy...
  4. Matthew Townsend from Brooklyn, United States writes: Gee Don, I can't think of one sports broadcast I saw that made any mention of the QMJHL brawl.

    Too much basketball going on down here for the ESPN folks to worry about hockey.
  5. Chris Eaton from writes: You know you screwed up big time when even Don Cherry is criticizing you for fighting!

    He's right though, sending a player to go beat on the opponents goalie (who wasn't involved in the fighting and didn't even throw a punch) is just ugly. Coaches should behave better then that.
  6. Donald S. Holmes from Canada writes: Why would Rogers consider giving motor-mouthed Mulliniks even one game as a commentator. Campbell is never so bad as when working with Mulliniks who simply spends all his time telling us what all the players are thinking.
  7. Pat Billings from CDN, Canada writes: This stuff has happenend before and will happen again.

    The difference is that cameras were rolling and it involved Patrick Roy. We all know Don Cherry, the #1 leaf shill, will go to any length to take some shine off the Habs franchise.
  8. Matt O from Canada writes: I'm convinced that Cherry is a thousand times smarter than he lets on when he's doing his circus show on HNIC, or when he's appearing 'in character' at other events.

    When he drops the act and comments seriously on something, he comes off as moderate and intelligent. I remember an interview he did a few years back (can't remember the magazine) where he made insightful comments on everything from hockey to the infamous 'Iraq war' show of CC.

    The problem is that people pay Cherry the big bucks to act like a big loudmouth clown, so he gives everyone what they want. Don't judge anyone you see on TV until you see them out of the spotlight is the moral, I guess.
  9. Steve Dunlop from writes: Patrick Roy is an idiot. Always has been ...always will be
    Patrick was defending his son and seems to be blaming everyone but his son for the emotional distress . Don is right this time
  10. Keith MacDonald from Canada writes: It never ceases to amaze me that Pat Tabler is still employed as an analyst by not one, but two majory sports networks in our fair country. He is the Canadian TV version of Tim McCarver, Crown Prince of the irrelevant observation. I know it is too much to expect a tandem like Tom Cheek and Jerry Howart, two of the best ever in any sport. But please do not make us sit through endless afternoons and evenings of Tabler's nonsensical prattling on. Jesse Barfield shows promise on CBC and Darren Fletcher would be an upgrade from his current 5 game commitment. Please, please, please no more Tabler.
  11. David Hogg from Canada writes: Cute, the angelic butter wouldn't melt in his mouth Cherry is critical of Roy's actions as a coach. He should look at old films of himself when he coached the Bruins. Did his players never fight? If one of his players backed down from a fight, Cherry was all over that player.

    Fighting should never have been allowed in hockey; however, over 100 years of rules and referees never managed to curb it. penalites of 2 and 5 minutes were and still are jokes. In any other professional sport, it results in automatic ejection and often in suspensions. If hockey wants to be taken seriously, they need to outlaw fighting completely and bring in harsh penalties in line with what other major sports use.
  12. Radio Guy from Toronto, Canada writes: I still think Sawkew sp? was better than he got credit for.

    Kudows to Campbell for working to improve, everyone in any line of work who has only been at it a few years, should welcome advice.

    He's okay and getting better all the time. Conversational is always better in baseball. Just watch a Dogers game with Vin Scully and you'll see a master at work.

Comments are closed

Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.

Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to top