Skip navigation

 Login or Register | Member Centre

Woods's winning streak ends

Associated Press

Latest comment posted at 11:38 AM EDT 24/03/08

World's No. 1 golfer's run of seven straight victories ends at rain-delayed CA Championship ...Read the full article

This conversation is closed

  1. Antonio San from Canada, Canada writes: Federer... now Woods: tough day for Gilette!
  2. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: Good - I am sick of hearing about it - Byron is safe (Tiger was playing down Nelson's streak as 'unimportant - Only the majors are important'--- Give ME a break - He knew it was impossible, that's why its 'unimportant'). Good thing he is such a great golfer, because he is very poor at just being a person.
  3. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: ??
  4. Craig Scott from Republic of Newfoundland, Canada writes: Rob C from T.O., Canada ...............

    I don't have a problem with Tiger. I don't think he discounts Nelson, I am sure he is just sick of everything he does being blown out of proportion.

    I think Tiger was a little pissed when so many people discounted his Grand Slam saying they were not all in the same calendar year. Fact is he held all 4 of the titles at the same time and I don't think he has gotten over that yet.
  5. Chad Noor from Montreal, Canada writes: Talk about overblowing hype! I couldn't believe it when articles started talking about a perfect season when the season was only a few weeks old. Win at least 2 majors before talking about a perfect season. Sheesh! Tiger's great, but some of these announcers need to be reeled in before they heap too many praises on him... Instead of building up unrealistic expectations, they should go back and remind us that even winning 2 weekends in a row is a phenomenal feat.
  6. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: LOL!
  7. Sean O'Reilly from Canada writes: Atleast the ridiculous talk of a perfect season can come to an end.
  8. Rick Biz from Paradise, Canada writes: What a washed up has been.
  9. Travis Sellar from Canada writes: While this is news, surely it's not of such importance to warrant it's placement within the main news area. Nothing of greater consequence happened yesterday (or today for that matter) than some guy not winning a game where a tiny white ball is hit around on grass?
  10. Lane Myers from Canada writes: Tiger Woods has to be the only golfer in the world that can loose one tournament, after a long streak of wins and it becomes news.
    The bottle is not half empty it is damn near full!
  11. larry bowe from Canada writes: Must be a slow news day is we have to read of this 'major' event in the main news section!!!...... who cares about this overpaid petulant narcissist?
  12. Mr. Pink from the wet coast, Canada writes:
    Proud Canadian from Canada writes: Tiger is a great model for the younger generation, a true gentleman and a great person to boot.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I agree with you PC. Given the scrutiny he is subject to; and the demands of the sponsors, public, press, etc. he handles himself extremely well. He is easily the most prominent athlete in the world since Mohammed Ali, and under pressure that none of us can ever comprehend. He really is quite extraordinary.
  13. Proud Canadian from Canada writes: Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: 'Good - I am sick of hearing about it - Byron is safe (Tiger was playing down Nelson's streak as 'unimportant - Only the majors are important'--- Give ME a break - He knew it was impossible, that's why its 'unimportant'). Good thing he is such a great golfer, because he is very poor at just being a person'. My response. Another senseless comment from a just as senseless person. U take the cake Rob, ur a total loser. Always have been, always will be. Tiger will once finished with the PGA tour the golfer who has won most tournaments, most majors, most money, and by far be voted the best golfer of all times. Just because he does not hail from Toronto, too bad. Tiger is a great model for the younger generation, a true gentleman and a great person to boot.
  14. Travis Sellar from Canada writes: ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. that's better.
  15. Luke P from Vancouver, Canada writes: larry bowe from Canada writes: who cares about this overpaid petulant narcissist?

    ??

    What makes him a petulant narcissist? And what makes him overpaid?
  16. Kevin Murray from Toronto, Canada writes: Too bad for Tiger but I'm glad the streak is over. Not because I don't like Tiger but because I'm sick of the golf media focusing on nothing else. This article is typical. Tiger finishes in fifth but most of the reporting is about Tiger's 'huge charge'. Tiger this, Tiger that, blah, blah, blah. Ogilvy stumbles and maybe if he really screwed up, Tiger could have won - except that three other guys finished ahead of him too. And, oh yeah, Tiger, Furyk, Singh, and Goose all finished with a 68. Nothing about their 'huge charges' though.
  17. Chili Palmer from Calgary, Canada writes: Ogilvy summed up the streak best when he said that it would make a nice career.

    Woods' dominance is such that his 5th place finish is newsworthy. Nelson's accomplishment is safe, and will likely remain so forever. There are no more 'team' events on tour, and the field has broadened considerably. It's difficult to compare eras in any sport.

    Woods is on pace to be the greatest athlete in modern history, why not enjoy the ride?
  18. G MACK from Toronto, Canada writes: ROB C...
    You lose too much sleep over this stuff and ALWAYS seem crusty! You seem like the type that gets bitter at those who are elite in a particular sport...you probably hated Gretzky too, etc.

    The facts remain clear that Tiger, Gretzky and the like create such hype around a sport that it affects the public, the media, merchandise sales, etc.

    The commentators talk about Tiger, because he's 'golf' for the moment...not because Tiger tells them to do so!

    Tiger is probably not worried about Byron's record, but still believes it could happen. Why not? Why do you hate that type of thinking so much? The reality is Tiger wants to win every match, when most of us go out there and give it our all until we take an '8' and then decide to throw in the towel on the '80' you were hoping for!

    Perhaps you're the one struggling to BE A PERSON!!!!!?????

    Think about it!
  19. Ed Long from Canada writes: Looks like Kraft Dinner at the Woods' house.
  20. Compos Mentis from Toronto, Canada writes: larry bowe from Canada writes: Must be a slow news day is we have to read of this 'major' event in the main news section!!!...... who cares about this overpaid petulant narcissist? ................... I care as do thousands of other sports fans who just love to see high level performance in any sport. As for being overpaid, Mr. Woods earns approximately $9m a month, according to the latest reports, about one tenth of that being earnings on the PGA tour. The balance comes from endorsements and his own business enterprises. These earnings reflect the success he has had as a player and is a testament to the tremendous practise and exercise regimen he has developed. Fact is, no one handed Mr. Woods a bag of money and said now go and earn it. He has worked many, many hours to be as good as he is and he is clearly this generations elite golfer, much as Arnold Palmer and Jack Nicklaus were before him. As for his being petulant, your comments are reflective of someone who is resentful and envious, but no mind, you are entitled to your own opinion, no matter how jaundiced!
  21. max from edmonton from Canada writes: Compos Mentis from Toronto, Canada I agree with your post. Many people begrudge people like Tiger their wealth. I suspect envy is the root of that. Fact is Tiger wins because he wants to. His dedication and hard work are equal parts to his talent.

    I can respect the fierce way he competes and enjoy watching him make history. As far as petulant goes.....Well we saw Tiger as a 19 year old throw the odd tantrum. We now see Tiger as a composed 30 year old. I think his ability to keep a clean reputation after having earned bags of money and fame as a young man is very telling as to his nature.

    How many youngsters get rich and famous only to turn into a trainwreck like Spears?

    Big difference with Woods, and I am happy to have my son look up to him as a role model
  22. Proud Canadian from Canada writes: One thing very different being an individual sport player vs a team player, if u dont make the cut in Golf, you go home broke. If you get blown out in the 1st round of a tennis tournament, you go home broke. If you sign a 7M$US a year contract with the Leafs and score in your own goal, u get a check of $73GUS for your effort. The next game, do it again, ur get a check for $73GUSD. Some people can not see what success means vs failure. Very very narrow view of what life's all about. Tiger is the best at golf, Fedderer is the best at Tennis, McCabe is not the best at hockey. Far from the best.
  23. Moose Lion from Canada writes: Well said G Mack.

    Just wanted to add: why on Earth does ROB C even think he knows Tiger as a person? Because he can pick up a newpaper and read an article about Tiger? Give me a break. You and I know Tiger the athlete, not the person. I hope when I have kids, they can learn this disticntion by the time they are 5 years old.
  24. King 99 from Canada writes: Woody Austin said it best."Streak. What streak? The guy plays once a month." Some people know Byron won 11 in a row. Fewer people know that he won 18 times that year. As far as I'm concerned he still holds the consecutive cut record also. Tigers phoney record had 20 tournies that were no cut events. So why add those? Also as far as his Tiger Slam. There's a reason that they call it a Grand Slam. You win all the majors in the same year. Part of the problem is the God like reception he always gets from the press and T.V. He's a great player for sure, but of his generation. Because the scheduling helps him a lot. Most of his big wins are on courses he likes and plays a lot. Anyone who plays good golf knows that if you play the same place time and time again you get pretty good at it.
  25. max from edmonton from Canada writes: King 99

    You are falling into the trap of comparing Modern Golf to Nelsons era. Can't do it anymore than you can compare Rocket Richard to Gretzky and now to Crosby.

    You think Woods has it easy? How about making shot after shot with an enormous throng of onlookers, how about keeping up with his frenetic pace of public appearances, charity events, etc.

    Also How many golfers were competing against Nelson? In todays world there are Millions of golfers. Out of those millions a few rise to the top and can compete at Tigers level.

    In Nelsons time what were there? Hundreds of thousands and a few rise to the top? That is a huge difference.

    Tiger is the best right now by a light year. Best ever? Well pour another drink and have fun asking the question because there is no possible way to get a scientific answer.
  26. Mayor Quimby from Scottsdale, United States writes: See, herein lies the problem. You can't level any criticism on Eldrick without followers and apologists like Proud Canadian, G MACK saying the problem is with you.

    Nobody in their right mind would dispute that they guy is the best golfer in the world and I enjoy watching him as much as anybody, but he's far from perfect. And being the best does not make him a role model.

    He wants to be highly compensated to play for his country in the Ryder and President's Cups in spite of his 9 figure income. He's lead the tour in fines for swearing on camera 3 years running. The media fawning over him constantly drives real golf fans, who know there's more than 1 guy in the field, absolutely mad. He plays only in Majors and events where his sponsor is involved. If he played any less he would not be able to keep his card. His primary sponsor not only makes bad equipment, Nike's human rights record is one of the worst ever among American owned companies. And finally, the guy is no athlete. He plays golf and happens to be in decent shape. Go to any gym in America at any time and you will find 10 guys in equal or better shape. So spare us the Mohammed Ali comparisons.
  27. max from edmonton from Canada writes: I will weigh in one last time. Mayor Quimby you didnt mention me in your criticism of Tigers fans. Probably an oversite.

    I understand how you could be upset with the media coverage of Tiger Woods. My advice is complain abou the media then because it is they that choose who to point the camera at.

    As far as a role model, well If my son sees a guy like Tiger who can work very hard to achieve his goals, and keep his nose clean and not ruin his life with drugs or Alcohol as a role model then I am glad for it. He could do a lot worse.

    Leads the tour in swearing fines? Well I certainly agree he is not perfect, and if he cusses too much I guess he is human. ( I have smashed my thumb with a hammer often enough that sonny boy has heard it all anyway)
  28. Mr. Pink from the wet coast, Canada writes: Mayor Quimby from Scottsdale, United States writes: ...And finally, the guy is no athlete. Good call, you're obviously well-informed.

    Tiger's workout

    During tournament weeks:
    30 minutes cardiovascular work, 30 minutes strength training

    During non-tournament weeks (three to four hours a day, five days a week):
    30 minute cardio workout (exercise bike, etc.)
    30 minute total body stretching with physical therapist
    30 minute cardio workout (treadmill, stairstepper, upper body climber)
    Strength training, six to eight reps with heavy weights
    Bench press (300 pounds)
    Shoulder press
    Squats
    Core training with implements (physio ball, etc.) working on golf specific movements
    Stretch out, cool down

    Source: Golf Digest
  29. doug barnes from Canada writes: I would add that much of my problem is with the media who fawn over Tiger. I agree he is a superb golfer but his winning streak was advertised that he had not lost since September - 6 or 7 months and only 7 wins? That means he played once a month. Jack Nicklaus and Byron Nelson played every week. I think that would take its toll. As for a perfect season. Why didn't he just stop and not play anymore and he would have had his perfect season. How can you have a perfect season when there is not a predetermined number of games? Imagine if the Patriots had said i don't think I'll play this week we are too tired.It is silly. But not Tiger's fault. It is the media who hype him to the detriment of other good golfers.
    Well I guess we are on to a new streak now. when he plays next month.
  30. Silent Majority from Canada writes: I think this is the beginning of Tiger's fall as the predominant player in the PGA. Yup, I think he has only got about 10 to 15 years before he becomes average.
  31. Moose Lion from Canada writes: Mayor Quimby:

    I would say the problem is that most of the time the critisms of Tiger are petty and poorly thought out. Take your post for example:

    1) Why shouldn't he be compensated for appearing in the Ryder Cup or Presidents Cup? Are you really naive enough to believe those events are about anything other than making money? A lot of parties make a lot of money through those events. Why shouldn't the main attraction(s) get a piece of that pie?

    2) Simple math. The guy is on camera 20 times more than any other golfer. Of course he is going to lead the tour for swearing on camera. And who cares? I think with the state of television/music/movies etc. Tiger saying the "F" word really shouldn't scar anybody.

    3) Its not just the media that fawns over him. Its REAL golf fans. If you don't believe me, go to Scotland to watch the Open championship one year and stand in cold wet weather with thousands of other fans trying to get a glimpse of him playing while every other group has tiny galleries in comparison. If the Scots aint real golf fans, I don't know who is.

    4) What is your point if he is an athlete or not? Call him a hippo if you want. I'm sure he couldn't care less.
  32. Patrick G from Calgary, Canada writes: It's odd in that my only real gripe with Tiger is something he doesn't even have control over. The reason why I can't give him his proper due respect 100% is that when Nicklaus was playing, his contemporaries didn't roll over. Palmer, Player, Trevino, Watson, Floyd, Irwin and Miller didn't give up just because Nicklaus was in the lead. Again, I can't blame Tiger for a tour full of players who often seem to be content to finish with a top 5. That's what makes Tiger so special is that he wants to simply win. When Bob May and Bart Bryant have been the ones to step it up and fall short, it speaks more about Tiger's supposed main rivals than anything. Mayor Q, that's why the media focuses on Tiger during tourneys. Tiger would keep his card regardless because he wins enough tourneys every year to keep it. Only has to finish top 125 on the PGA tour money list to keep his priveleges. If he can do it after the first 3 tourneys of the season, then so be it. The bad equipment argument sounds even lamer from you than it does from Mickelson, who behind the scenes has a reputation of being one of the biggest jerks on tour. Don't know what you think about him, but Hefty is about as genuine as $3 dollar bill. Decent shape. Dude, what are you smoking. Even putting the bio-mechanics and the mental part of the game aside, Tiger is flat out a physical specimen ... period. It's just another reason why he can dominate because he doesn't get tired and can hit the snot out of the ball from the rough when others have to play it back onto the fairway. To rule out my apparent man-love for Tiger, I will simply end by saying my favourite player is Goosen, who by the way finished second. If Retief had more finished like this over the last 2 years, he'd still be top 3 in the world and maybe we'd hear more about him. It's time the rest of the field shows up and actually beat him down the stretch.
  33. King 99 from Canada writes: Some good posts here on Tiger. I'm not saying he's nOT great. He's the best of his generation(like I said before). The guys on camera more than anyone, EVEN if he's 5, 10 shots behind. Why? Because he's the moneymaker for the PGA. Now if it wasn't for Arnold Palmer there wouldn't be a Tiger and the purses would be a lot less. You see Palmer brought golf to television. I've never said tiger wasn't any good. My problem is the god like statis given him by the media. You don't see that with Federer in Tennis. They just say he's the best and leave it at that. They don't fawn all over him like Jim Nance, et al. It's the media that come up with these records, real or wanna be real. Tiger slam riiiiiite. Tiger's the best now but he didn't have the competition Jack faced. Look at the hall of famers Nicklaus faced. More multiple major winners than Tiger has faced. Woody Austin had the nuts to come out and say "WHAT STRAEK, THE GUY PLAYS ONCE A MONTH".
  34. Mr. Pink from the wet coast, Canada writes: King 99 from Canada writes:

    Tiger's the best now but he didn't have the competition Jack faced. Look at the hall of famers Nicklaus faced. More multiple major winners than Tiger has faced.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Sorry K99, but the fields Tiger faces are far deeper than anything Jack faced. When Jack played, Americans overwhelmingly dominated. Now golf is much more global with Euros, Aussies, South Africans, Canadians, and South Americans also winning majors.

    And as for facing major winners, do the math. If Tiger is winning so many of them then of course the rest of the pack will produce fewer major winners.

    Tiger is the best of his generation and will become the best ever when he eclipses Jack's 18. They are both incredible golfers, and foremost supreme competitors. But Tiger has brought an athleticism to golf that no one else ever even contemplated before he arrived.
  35. King 99 from Canada writes: Mr Pink. Tiger has never or will ever face the multiple major winners that Jack faced. You can look up in any stat book to see those results. I agree the fields are deep and there are talented golfers, but the money is too easy nowadays and guys are happy with top 20's. As far as athletisism Player was doing it long before Tiger was born. I don't know how old you are but if you ever get a chance go see the Hall of Fame. Remember also that guys back in Jacks day were crushing an outmoded ball with outmoded equipment. That's one thing that's changed dramatically in todays game. I'm not saying Tiger isn't great. Never did never will, BUT just check out who Jack had to play against. That's the problem with some people today. They jump on the Tiger wagon and nobody else exists. The PGA has a lot of history to it and Tiger is just one part of it.
  36. Mr. Pink from the wet coast, Canada writes:
    K99: Without looking at the history books, my recollection is that there were only two guys that held up reasonably well against Jack: Trevino and Watson (Trevino in particular--he was tough). In contrast, nobody has held up against Tiger. I do not think that Ernie, Vijay, Hefty, and a few others are content to finish top 20, and would suggest that for the most part they simply do not have the strength/resolve to stay with Tiger. I remember at the 2000 (British) Open Ernie shaking his head and staying that even on his best week, he didn't think he could put up anything close to the numbers Tiger had.

    I take your point about Player and his fitness regimen. However, given his size it was something that he arguably had to do just to compete. I mean he had to bust his shoelaces to hit it 260/270 in those days. Tiger, when he was young, used his superior fitness to overpower courses (similiar to a young Jack, who was a big guy when he first came up). Nowadays, Tiger has learned to pick his spots with the power game, and is a supremely complete player.

    (Just a side note on Woody. He is a notorious hothead who shoots from the lip. That said, full marks to him for staying with Tiger at Southern Hills last year.)
  37. G MACK from Toronto, Canada writes: KING 99...
    Tiger hardly plays? He's 32 and has 64 Tournament Wins...Sam Snead reached 64 wins at age 46!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Please give a little and stop with such a sad argument, that only supports his greatness. Your criticism is that he plays LESS then any other player, yet he has MORE WINS, MONEY, MAJORS and FEDEX points! How is that possible? He's able to work less and have great success and you think that's bad. You don't like him, so you should be happy he doesn't play as often. Imagine if he did?
    You also make a ridiculous comment that he always plays the same courses...don't they all??? Check the names...I just did and they all actually play the schedules that individually suits them.

    For those that criticize Tiger (Sabattini, Woody, Ames, the list goes on) have nothing to stand on and is always a joke to hear. The expectation is that he'll pass Jack next year at the age of 33...do you even know the impact of that? I doubt it!

    Go enjoy Paula Creamer and the LPGA...it's more your style I think!
  38. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: Claude: You have a Leaf obsession. Do you have any comments on Spezza's contract? How about Wade Redden? Is he earning his money? Fisher? Gerber? How's he doing? Are they earning their big money? Don't worry about McCabe. He'll be making the same salary during the playoffs that the Sens are.
  39. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: Back to the subject at hand - - Tiger is a great golfer. He'll go down as the best ever I have no doubt. Lets not mistake that in any way with class. I am willing to bet that every player on the tour uses bad language at some time or other. Tiger habitually fires off "f bombs" on national TV. Some role model. Tiger is all about Tiger - Let's set that straight. He has nothing else going for him. I keep hearing how wonderful Tiger has been for golf....If there isn't anything in it for Tiger, he doesn't want any part of it. Tiger won't play WGC events off US soil, so they're all held in the US...what's so "World" about that? Is that good for golf? Bigger purses - Big deal. How does that help golf fans? It helps pro golfers. It also means higher priced tickets and no crowds when he doesn't show up, which is usually 3 out of 4 weeks. How is that good for golf? There are new tourn. sponsors coming in all the time. Where did the old ones go? Sometimes they can't find new ones...hmmmm. Is that good for golf?. They lost money and split, but somehow Tiger is good for golf. Maybe they have been overpaying Tiger (you know, the way the Senators have overpaid their players.)
  40. Rob C from T.O., Canada writes: G Mack" Just what is "the impact of that"? Not sure how there is an "impact". Is it impressive? I guess so, but nothing will actually change, will it? I for one actually enjoy the coverage more when he doesn't show up. You are correct making that statement. For one thing, it has become boring to see him win so often. I enjoy watching all the players play. He dominates the coverage. Like today for example, he was effectively done with a few holes to play. But they wouldn't stop talking about the "streak coming t an end" and showing his every shot. He was done. No other player gets on TV when they are out of it. Now, it is Tiger, so they do it for monetary reasons. He attracts new neophyte viewers - but I am a golf addict & I just get sick of it. People watch for the curiosity of Tiger. I am long since over that.
  41. Proud Canadian from Canada writes: Rob C. If you had 1/2 a brain, the RCMP would be looking for you. With that, I will not read nor comment on any further of your postings anywhere. And I wish you treat me the same. I consider you as one dumb Torontonian, one that has nothing concrete to offer, only comments that are unthought, uneducated, and unfounded. Ur a total loser. Final coment to you, go on with your life, I will no longer respond to a dummy like you. As one driver said tonite to another, ur nothing but a DIESEL DUMMY. Ur nothing but a LOSER DUMMY.
  42. Proud Canadian from Canada writes: Further comment to the above, if you notice, Mickelson plays tournaments Tiger doesnt, because he has a chance to win them. When he and Tiger are in the field, 99 chances out of 100 Mickelson finishes back or well back. As far as Ernie Els goes, saw him at the Buick Open a while back, what a tall man, and what a golf swing. You have to see him just even practice swing to appreciate his talent. Seen em all, Daly, Freddy, Monty, Vijay, all of them. Who do you have to be 6 holes ahead of to even get a glimpse of him on the green, Tiger Woods. Got a chance to go to Muirfield in Dublin OH with buds this year, the course that Jack Built. May do it, they go every year, its just a stone throw's away from the great part of Ontario, the South West corner.
  43. Don M from Canada writes: It's not Tiger some of you folks don't like, it's the media? He is the best and no one can take that away from him. It all comes down to the media and the announcers.
  44. L. C. from Canada writes: Mayor Quimby from Scottsdale, United States writes: "Nobody in their right mind would dispute that they guy is the best golfer in the world and I enjoy watching him as much as anybody, but he's far from perfect. And being the best does not make him a role model." - He is a role model because he is hard working and determine. He set his focus on the right thing and commit to it. Tell me who can be better role model?? "He wants to be highly compensated to play for his country in the Ryder and President's Cups in spite of his 9 figure income." - he is PRO athlete. What's wrong with demanding compensation. What if he play the Ryder Cup and hurt himself or some sort of career ending injuries? Back, Wrists or Shoulders, you name it. "His primary sponsor not only makes bad equipment, Nike's human rights record is one of the worst ever among American owned companies." - That's not his problem, because he is here to make money, not to be a SAINT!! "And finally, the guy is no athlete. He plays golf and happens to be in decent shape. Go to any gym in America at any time and you will find 10 guys in equal or better shape. So spare us the Mohammed Ali comparisons." - Are you serious about that? I guess the world muscle man champion is a sport to you and those guys wearing that tiny underwear with oil all over the body are the true athletes then? Look at the overweighted baseball players? or the Ultraslim Marathon runners? Final word.. if you don't say anything, no one would know you are a bit.. Retarded
  45. L. C. from Canada writes: Mayor Quimby from Scottsdale, United States writes: "Nobody in their right mind would dispute that they guy is the best golfer in the world and I enjoy watching him as much as anybody, but he's far from perfect. And being the best does not make him a role model." - He is a role model because he is hard working and determine. He set his focus on the right thing and commit to it. Tell me who can be better role model?? "He wants to be highly compensated to play for his country in the Ryder and President's Cups in spite of his 9 figure income." - he is PRO athlete. What's wrong with demanding compensation. What if he play the Ryder Cup and hurt himself or some sort of career ending injuries? Back, Wrists or Shoulders, you name it. "His primary sponsor not only makes bad equipment, Nike's human rights record is one of the worst ever among American owned companies." - That's not his problem, because he is here to make money, not to be a SAINT!! "And finally, the guy is no athlete. He plays golf and happens to be in decent shape. Go to any gym in America at any time and you will find 10 guys in equal or better shape. So spare us the Mohammed Ali comparisons." - Are you serious about that? I guess the world muscle man champion is a sport to you and those guys wearing that tiny underwear with oil all over the body are the true athletes then? Look at the overweighted baseball players? or the Ultraslim Marathon runners? Final word.. if you don't say anything, no one would know you are a bit.. Retarded
  46. Robert Mutis from Port Coquitlam, Canada writes: King 99, you are correct to a degree about guys being happy with a Top 20 finish these days. And of course the money is way better (because of Tiger!). But remember, back in the day when Nicklaus and friends were playing, you could win playing par golf. There is no way you can win with par golf today; you can hardly even make the cut in a lot of tournaments. Maybe it's the equipment, maybe it's the evolution of golfers into more athletic professionals, or maybe it's the fact that today's pros spend so much more time on the practice tee. Nicklaus, Palmer, Irwin, Floyd, Trevino aside, there are a lot of golfers on today's tour who would have dominated the golf scene back then - and a lot of former PGA pros who wouldn't be able to hack the grind on today's tour.
  47. Mayor Quimby from Scottsdale, United States writes: LC - which must stand for Lost Cause - you are an idiot. Though your entire post basically just quotes me, you failed to notice I didn't say overweight ball players were great athletes. I said he's not a great athlete. And if you believe any comparison between Eldrick and Mohammed Ali is apt, I’m giving you too much credit
  48. G MACK from Toronto, Canada writes: ROB C...
    The last few holes were the most exciting! You must be talking about the Cuban Open?
  49. max from edmonton from Canada writes: Mayor Q, what is your point of comparing Muhammed Ali to Tiger?

    So Ali was a better boxer, big deal. Do you think Gordie Howe was a good athlete? How about OJ Simpson, how about Wayne Gretzky, how about Pele? Could any of them beat Ali in a pro boxing match?

    The answer is NO. And none of them could beat Tiger in a golf game. They are all great athletes in their own sport (or were).

    Comparing a Boxer to a golfer is LAME. It is not an argument.

    I like the poster who said go ahead and call Tiger a hippo, I don't think he'd care.

Comments are closed

Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.

Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff

close

Alert us about this comment

Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.

Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.

Back to top