This conversation is closed
- Skip to the latest comment
-
sam simonelli from dorval qc, Canada writes: The points being awarded are just too large to be taken seriously. What does it mean when a player is 3,850 points behind another? I suggest awarding 3 pts for 1st place, and 1 for a top ten. This way when a player is 2 points behind another in the standings, you know he needs 2 top ten finishes to tie.
- Posted 28/12/06 at 4:32 PM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
-
Neil in Calgary from Canada writes: 10M to the winner!!!! So in one tournament a better than average..1.5M dollar tour player can win more than Tiger did all year!! Putting him #1 in money instantly and what PGA tour player of the year?? I guess the PGA tour is desparate. What they need to do is get Tiger to agree to a set schedule and then make that schedule manditory (except for injury) to all top 50 players. Then you would see some action. If they continuie to allow the top players to pick and choose the tournaments they participate in then you will continuie to have issues.
- Posted 29/12/06 at 11:49 AM EDT | Alert an Editor | Link to Comment
Comments are closed
Thanks for your interest in commenting on this article, however we are no longer accepting submissions. If you would like, you may send a letter to the editor.
Report an abusive comment to our editorial staff
close
Alert us about this comment
Please let us know if this reader’s comment breaks the editor's rules and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don’t break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
